

Who Be Poppin’ the Bubbly?
By: Steve | May 8th, 2008
by Akeem Samuels and Stephen Rosenshein
Adrian Hanauer would like us to believe that he and fellow Seattle Sounder FC owners, Roth and Allen, are assembling a world-class squad with talent from around the globe. He has been scouting in Africa and South America, looking for players that will propel the squad into the so-called “major” international cups and competitions that MLS teams play in within the first three years of expansion.
In sports, it is always fun to root for the underdog or the Cinderella squad. We love to see a minnow like Cardiff make its way to the FA Cup Final, or a lower seeded March Madness team show-up a nationally respected program. In soccer leagues around the world, we tune in to newly promoted sides to see if they can stick around in their countries top flight. In the MLS, where there is no promotion/relegation system, expansion is the closest thing we have to the epic struggle to stay afloat.
At the end of the 2009 campaign, will the Sounders FC be popping champagne or cooling off in the cellar? Here is a brief look at the history of expansion in the MLS and how Seattle may stack up against past expansion squads.
A Look Back
MLS expansion began in 1998, when the league went from 10 to 12 teams, adding the Chicago Fire and the Miami Fusion. Miami ended the 98’ season in relative mediocrity with a 15-17 record including 5 shootout wins. In 1998, the MLS did not have ties (gag), but did have the playoffs (double gag), which the Fusion entered as the 4th seed in the Eastern Conference.
The Chicago Fire, on the other hand, faired much better. The team ended up with a 20-12 record and eventually toppled DC United 2-0 in the team’s first ever MLS cup. They also completed the unlikely double by beating the Columbus Crew to claim the U.S. Open Cup title.
Still struggling to gain a foothold on American soil in 2001, MLS had to retract two of the twelve teams. The Miami Fusion and the Tampa Bay Mutiny were eliminated from the league. However, expansion began anew in 2005 with the franchises Real Salt Lake and Chivas USA. Real Salt Lake ended up 5-5-22 (yay, ties!) while Chivas ended up 4-6-22 and dead last in the Western Conference. It was not a pretty sight for expansion teams that year.
In 2006, the San Jose Earthquakes brought out the moving trucks and became the Houston Dynamo. Since their relocation, the Dynamo, though not necessarily a true “expansion team” has enjoyed a stellar 26-16-20 record and 2 MLS Cup championships.
As the MLS continued to grow, 2007 saw the league cross the border into Toronto. Despite a raucous and sometimes riotous fan base, Toronto FC had the worst record in the MLS in 2007, going 6-7-17.
The MLS returned to San Jose this year, where the current squad is currently 1-1-3 thus far in 2008.
Here is a look at the performance of current MLS expansion teams through 2007
Team – Overall Record (W, T, L) – Years in the League, # MLS Cups
Miami, 56-10-56 .500, 4 years, 0 MLS Cup
Chicago Fire, 143-54-108 .557, 10 years, 1 MLS Cup
Real Salt Lake, 21-23-50 .346, 3 years, 0 MLS Cup
Chivas USA, 29-27-38 .452, 3 years, 0 MLS Cup
Houston Dynamo, 26-20-16 .581, 2 MLS Cups
Toronto FC, 6-7-17 .316, 0 MLS Cup
Ice the Bubbly?
So out of five genuine expansion teams, Houston not included, only Chicago has enjoyed first season success by winning it all their first year. How was Chicago able to pull off the seemingly impossible? Simple, they put a talented squad on the field.
Under head coach Bob Bradley (ring any bells?) Chicago featured some quality international players like Poles Peter Nowak, Jerzy Podbrozny and Roman Kosecki, Mexican Jorge Campos, and Czech Lubos Kubik. In addition, the side featured a few quality homegrown products like Josh Wolff, Ante Razov, and Chris Armas. With the right combination of talent, and just maybe because no one saw them coming, the Fire took the championship in their first year as a franchise.
Can the Seattle Sounders FC follow in the footsteps of Chicago, or are they more likely to suffer a tough first season like most expansion franchises in most sports leagues?
Well, in a league like the MLS, where no one team is light years ahead of another, anything can happen. If the Seattle owners turn out their pockets and shell out big bucks for a quality roster, I have little doubt that the side will be competitive.
It is highly unlikely that they can win the championship their first year. It is possible we will never see another MLS expansion team win it all in their inaugural season (congratulations Fire fans). However, with the right draft picks and signings leading up to the kick-off season, the Seattle Sounders FC will have more cause to toast champagne than chill out in the cellar at the end of the 2009 campaign.
Going to the Arsenal game? Find out how to get to North London and where to stay near Emirates Stadium.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
|
Comments | Add your comment
-



I expect to contend for a playoff spot the first year. Of course with the number of teams that qualify…
Posted from
United States

-



Akeem points to a seemingly obvious, but often ignored concept: Put the best players on the field. Instead of worrying about image, worry about the game and the rest will follow. Kudos Akeem.
Posted from
United States

-



don’t know much about soccer, but akeem brings up a valid point that image is necessary for the team to expand
Posted from
United States

-



akeem, you pose excellent points. i believe with a mixture of effort, dexterity, and willingness to put only the best legs forward, there’s a definite chance.
i appreciate the positivity.Posted from
United States

-



yea AKEEM,
you aure do know what ur talking about, but not as much as StevePosted from
United States

-



Basic rule of sport is smart investment correlates to strong return. You don’t necessarily have to shell out “big bucks” if you have good scouting in place. That’s what a new franchise like Seattle needs.
Good points made though, nice to see MLS growing.
Posted from
United States

-



I agree, Stephen is clearly smarter than Akeem
Posted from
United States

-



Yeah, soccer definitely needs an image overhaul and more expansion teams to build a stronger national presence. And just like Akeem states, it’s probably most important for Seattle and the other teams to attract more international talent, just like LA did with Beckham. If it doesn’t help get these teams a championship, it will if anything help bring in more revenue and spectators.
Posted from
United States

-



Great article. Expansion teams are always a tricky subject. Most expansion teams do go into the league with little hope of winning a title. Akeem brings up great points and I agree that underdogs are favored in American sports but they are few and far between.
Posted from
United States

-



Hmm, Steve truly brings up really great points. He truly exercises great thought in writing this article. You must tell us your inspiration!
Posted from
United States

-



Nice article. Wonder who helped edit.
Posted from
United States

-



First of all the title sucks - also I wrote that first sentence so I want author credits - that is all - good article otherwise
Posted from
United States

-



I think the benefit that Sounders FC will have is the current Sounders- not a bad side, but most importantly not a bad side that have worked together for a while. Take four or five (or more) of the best players, you’ve got a core team that knows each other and knows how to play with each other. Most expansion teams have never seen each other before having to start pre-season and then a league campaign. The Sounders, hopefully, will not have that much of a problem.
Posted from
United States

-



good insight akeem on what it takes to get a team going, you definately know what you’re talking about when it comes to soccer. good work

Posted from
United States

-



I BE POPPIN’ THE BUBBLY….FOOL!
Posted from
United States

-



I’m pretty sure both Stephen and Akeem have no idea what they are talking about.

Posted from
United States

-



I couldnt agree more
Posted from
United States

-



I think Abby’s point of a core team who has been playing together for a while is a VERY valid one.
Posted from
United States

-



You guys need to keep the cork in the bottle. You forget one very important detail… YOUR SEATTLE!. In every major pro. league that Seattle can muster a team, the Seattle Franchise is the red headed step child of the league. The most you guys can hope for is that the Sounders don’t have the worst kits in their respective league like the Mariners, Seahawks, and Sonics do. Portland will win an MLS cup before the Sounders do. Here’s hoping FC Dallas gets to knock the Sounders out of the US Open Cup again this year. VIVA LA HOOPS!
Posted from
United States

-



This idiot didnt leave a link, so I cant respond personally, but if you think about it, whens the last time dallas won something? Cowboys right? Been a while.
Also, Ill give you the seahawks, but there is no one besides your skeetin ass that thinks the Mariners of Sonics have the ugliest kits in their leagues.
I also really like how you use the word “muster” consider that in both the MLB and NBA, our markets are about 20 times larger than the markets in Dallas.
Dont bother responding to another one of my posts buddy, thanks.
Posted from
Chile

-



Why would you need to respond personally? It’s just a little good natured ribbing. Why are you Seattle folk all so touchy? Is it the Rain, All the loosing, or are you guys just too strung out on espresso?
SCOREBOARD
Dallas Cowboys 5 Superbowls
Dallas Stars 1 Stanly Cup.
Dallas has 5 Major Pro-Sports Franchises.
Can you guys still count the 1979 NBA Title after the Sonics move to OK City? (Great NBA Market you have there)
Viva La Hoops!Posted from
United States

-



Why do people think they can always pick on seattle just because we havent won championships.
Like seriously. dallas hasnt won ANYTHING in THIS century. Stop living in the past.
Posted from
Chile

-



akeem and stephen are awesome!!! great article!
Posted from
United States

-



But we have won lots of stuff since parachute pants were in style. How about Seattle? We don’t pick on Seattle because you haven’t won a championship in anything, it’s because you woefully bad in everything (and have horrible taste in uniforms). Thanks for the spirited debate! You may not like me now, but that first sounders/FC DALLAS match will have more meaning for you next year. Viva La Hoops!
Posted from
United States

-



Seattle Sounders FC will win a championship before Dallas, guaranteed.
Posted from
Chile

Leave a Reply
If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse ourCommenting Guidelines.













