

My Not-Much-of-a-Preview for Chicago-Seattle (OR: Beware of Blanco!)
By: Laurie | May 1st, 2009
If you haven’t watched a Chicago game in the past couple of years, here’s the one thing you need to know:
Cuauhtemoc Blanco will piss you off.
Seriously, when it comes to the art of making the most innocuous brush of shoe-leather-on-skin look like Assault-With-Intent, Blanco is Michelangelo. If Tyrone Marshall’s glorious, masterful tackle in the box last week had been on Blanco, chances are pretty high that A) the ref would have awarded a penalty, B) Marshall would have been sent off, and C) the world would have come away convinced that Tyrone had shattered a large number of Temo’s bones. His facial bones. Blanco is that good at that south-of-the-border drama thing.
And I’m not talking entirely about the out-and-out dive. (Although I am, of course, talking about that, too.) But I’m also talking about really, truly, dramatically and unquestionably drawing attention to the fact that he’s been genuinely fouled. Because when it comes to this skill, there’s nobody better than Blanco.
The good news, if you can call it that, is that Blanco has been under a cloud this week with questions about whether or not he unduly influenced referee Jair Marrufo in the Columbus game. So perhaps referees will be a little less likely to fall under his spell? We can hope, right?
So. Yeah. Chicago Fire tomorrow. The only undefeated team, despite the fact that they’ve won only two games. (In case you’d forgotten, we’ve won four.) Based on the one game I’ve seen this season, Chicago has a gorgeous style of play and great depth. This seems to be a factor in all of the Power Rankings I’m seeing lately, which rank them as high as first or second, and never any lower than fifth.
I’m wondering if these power rankings are forgetting that despite the fact that Chicago is not actually losing games, they’re not actually winning them, either. They’re doing a lot of the coming-back-to-draw thing, mixed in with the occasional blowing-lead-to-draw thing. So, in summary, while they have not yet lost, they certainly are not unbeatable, provided we play things right.
I’ve seen some discussion on who should mark who in this game, and especially who should mark major goal-scoring threats Blanco and Brian McBride. My one thought is this: Do NOT have our hot-blooded Osvaldo Alonso mark Blanco. Unless, of course, the goal is to have Alonso get those last two yellows all in one shot and serve out the suspension next week against LA. Because Blanco could make that happen.
(Question: If a player gets a second yellow in one game and it happens to be his fifth yellow overall, does he have to serve a two-week suspension? My guess would be yes, but I’ve never seen a rule to that effect. If Alonso marks Blanco, we could put that to the test.)
Also, Tyrone Marshall could mark McBride, because Marshall is very positionally savvy, which a player like McBride will require. And given that McBride is 36 (to Marshall’s 34,) Marshall probably wouldn’t get outrun.
(Admit it. You’re smiling. It’s funny ’cause it’s true. And by that I mean: Love you, Tyrone!)
And I’m pretty sure that’s all I have to say about Chicago. Go Sounders!!
![]() |
MLS Forums | MLS Results |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



I agree, Blanco will piss you off. My wife says the same thing. But you must admit he has tremendous precision with shooting. Hold your breath whenever the ball is at his feet because he can score from anywhere. He does make the game exciting. He’s one of those guys you love to hate.
Posted from
United States

-



I agree. Blanco is the worst! He has strengths as a footballer… but still not enough to be considered any sort of respectable footballer. If anything he’s the type of DP that hurts the image of the league. Whatever… we’ll come away with three points from this match!
Posted from
United States

-



Jeremy, yes! I wrote this last night, and later I was lying in bed thinking, “I really should have written a sentence or two pointing out that the man has other skills, too.”
And then I thought, “Wait. I’m awake over a post I already spent an hour on, for free…why exactly? I don’t even LIKE Blanco!” And then I rolled over and went back to sleep.
Posted from
United States

-



Ben, agree and disagree. I don’t think it’s so horrible for MLS to have villains — the kind of player who is adored by his team and hated by everyone else. It adds spice to games that might otherwise be a tad boring for someone who’s not already involved with a team.
And in the interest of honesty, I must say that in the one Chicago game I watched this year, Blanco had toned down the drama and was pretty much just playing the game, and he looked lethal, especially in combination with McBride. McBride scored twice in the first 20 minutes, and Blanco was really an engine making things happen. (I think it was the fourth game of the season, the one against KC, and he hadn’t been starting up to that point, so I think he had something to prove.)
Of course, then the team let their foot off the gas and allowed a sub-par KC come back for the draw. So make of this what you will.
Posted from
United States

-



Don’t forget that although Chicago has only played two home games, they have perhaps played one MLS’ easiest schedules. Their six opponents combined have won a total of 8 games compared to the Sounders opponents 16 wins.
Chicago’s opponents have a total of 37 points compared to the Sounders opponents 56.
I think the people who make rankings don’t look at that fact.
However, teams in MLS don’t win on the road very often, so it will be difficult for SSFC to come away with any points. But, that is why they play the game.
Posted from
United States

-



Laurie, I love ya, but have to disagree on Blanco.
Yes, villains are great in sports, but only the kind you love to hate. Blanco actually gives American’s who ‘hate’ certain aspects of soccer legitimacy to their arguments. I think he’s the exact opposite of what the MLS needs to draw in people unfamiliar with the game.
His skills are unquestioned, I even think his attitude is ok, as it applies to playing the villain, but he cheapens the game and dives around the pitch more than Fu Mingxia! I would be happy if he never set foot on an American pitch again…sorry!
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed













