

My Utterly Unofficial Awards for the Western Conference Semifinal, First Leg
By: Laurie | October 30th, 2009
- Let’s start with the “MOST RIDICULOUS NAME EVER” award to:
The “Eastern/Western Conference Semifinals.”With 50% of the spots awarded to wild cards, let’s just abandon this conference charade once and for all. The rest of the universe says you’re the “Cup quarterfinals.” Deal with it.
- The “SEE IF I EVER SUCK UP TO YOU AGAIN” award to:
Referee Ricardo Salazar.Ricardo? I can sort of understand that — after the Beckham red card, and the diving yellow to Moreno, and your ignoring of Divotgate, and the fact that Seattle was 3-0-1 with you on the field — you might kind of feel a need to balance the scales a bit. But you were asleep at the switch last night and risked completely losing control of the game. I hereby take back every nice thing I thought about you in my insomniac ravings.
And Alex Prus is my favorite referee. So there.
- The “NOT QUITE FIRING ON ALL CYLINDERS” award to:
Seattle Sounders, particularly the offense.Okay, guys. (Stevie Z? Fredy? Freddie? I’m especially lookin’ at you.) You’ve had this game to work out the kinks and get over the playoff jitters and to recognize that Houston are no pushovers. And to remember that you’re supposed to pass to the guys in green. (Or blue, as the case may be.) Now let’s see the team we’ve come to know and love in Houston next weekend.
(Freddie and Fredy? Do we need to send you on another camping trip?)
- The “IT DOESN’T TAKE MUCH TO CHANGE YOUR REPUTATION FROM ‘LEGEND’ TO ‘TOTAL ASSHAT’” award to:
Pat Onstad.Yo. Pat. What the HELL was up with that knockdown thing you did to Montero? And then what was up with you holding your face? If Salazar had had bigger cojones (and if Montero hadn’t created his own reputation for going down a bit easy in the past) you would have been off the field and out of the next match. And wouldn’t that have been fun?
P.S. I think the Grecian formula is seeping into your brain.
- The “THE BOY WHO CRIED WOLF” award to:
Fredy Montero, after the Onstad knockdown. Many hours and several replays later, I’m still wondering: What the hell was that?!?!Let this be a lesson to anyone who even considers playing with South American style: Your reputation for embellishment can come back to haunt you later, when a game-changing call really should go your way.
- The “GLOVES OF GLUE” award to:
Kasey Keller.No hesitation. No bobbles. No kidding. You were rock solid in goal.
(And on our part? No regrets about having you in this job.)
- The “WAIT. WHY AREN’T YOU A STARTER AGAIN?” award to:
Patrick Ianni.A solid central defender, sure. We’ve got a couple of those. But ALSO a dangerous threat with your head on set pieces? Holy crap, son, what are you doing on the bench?
That said, though? Get well soon, Tyrone.
- On a related note, the “YET AGAIN, WHO WAS THE IDIOT WHO CONCEIVED THE CROSSBAR CHALLENGE?” award to:
Patrick Ianni and whatever idiot conceived the Crossbar Challenge.Wouldn’t it have been a whole lot better to have that one go UNDER the bar and have Seattle going into the second leg up 1-0? Just wondering.
- The “THE BLOODY BANDAGE IS A BADGE OF HONOR” award to:
Nate Jaqua.Another solid game, Nate. (And, not coincidentally, the second Houston game you’ve ended with a bloody head.) Consider me a “Jaqua as right midfielder” convert.
Now next time let’s have the calls and the goals go your way, okay?
- The “YOU KNOW I CAN’T CONDONE THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOR, BUT…” award to:
Whichever fan tossed the cup of beer at the referees after Jaqua seemed to score, except that we later discovered the play had been whistled dead way the heck up the field. Despite the fact that we seemed to maintain possession and advantage the entire time and the whistle didn’t even blow until Nate was twenty yards upfield and goalbound.Beer-tossing fan? That was wrong. Completely wrong. Utterly, unquestionably, horribly wrong.
(My id says well done, though.)
P.S. Ricardo and Mr. Assistant Referee? Does the word “advantage” mean anything to you?”
![]() |
MLS Forums | MLS Results |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments | Add your comment
-



Exactly what I’m thinking! Spot on!
Posted from
United States

-



Laurie, more douchebaggy (and possibly bookable) behavior from Onstad at 1:35 in this vid (preceding the other incident)… Montero knows how to get under the keeper’s skin. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0UbHPOMhaw
Posted from
United States

-



Thank you, Dave. “Douchebaggy” is now my newest favorite word.
(It’s a noun! It’s an adjective! It’s multi-purpose and just rolls off the tongue!)
Posted from
United States

-



Also, good catch on the Montero shove. I completely missed that. As did the refereeing staff. If they’d seen that, I think what happened next would definitely have been a red.
Posted from
United States

-



Oh, and also? Did you catch on the replay of the Onstad belly bump where Montero starts to grab his face and then thinks better of it?
I’m guessing it was the liberal application of Beckham’s “Instinct for Men.”
(P.S. I love it when I comment spam my own blog.)
Posted from
United States

-



the onstad incident is getting all the press…. and it was huge, but that lack of advantage is the one that just kills me.
onstad getting a yellow instead of a red was interpretation of the rules (rightly or wrongly) by the ref.
not playin advantage when there was an IMMEDIATE advantage, is just not knowing the rules.
laurie, from where i was sitting, it looked like you were the one that threw the beer. i was on the other side of the pitch, but i swear that was you.
Posted from
United States

-



oh, and i confirmed onstad is guilty of douchebaggery. he fell into many of the definitions.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=douchebaggery
Posted from
United States

-



laurie, thank you for these…. i always enjoy them.
i’m right there with you on salazar. a ref i previously enjoyed has seriously hurt his image in my eyes…. as well as onstad. get out of my head!
Posted from
United States

-



laurie, from where i was sitting, it looked like you were the one that threw the beer. i was on the other side of the pitch, but i swear that was you.
It actually came from the next section over. But if I’d still had beer at that point, I probably would have considered it. Even at $8.25 a glass.
Posted from
United States

-



it’s actually “douchebaggery”, if you’re using it as a noun.
“douchebaggy” is an adjective or adverb, depending on usage.
Posted from
United States

-



In that usage, ABT, you are entirely right.
However, I was thinking about using it as a noun in the following sense:
“Wow! That Onstad was a real douchebaggy last night, wasn’t he?”
Similar to “douchecanoe” or “doucherocket.”
Posted from
United States

-



Salazar made some mistakes…the advantage was a bad one but it doesn’t have to do with reading, it was mostly just bad luck.
Wasn’t his best game, but you guys are wrong about him screwing up that badly. This was our game, and we let it go, blame the ref if you’re just that bored.
Posted from
United States

-



Bad officiating doesn’t excuse Seattle’s inability to finish (which has been a problem all season). Likewise, Seattle’s inability to finish doesn’t excuse bad officiating.
I don’t think anyone is blaming the ref.
Posted from
United States

Leave a Reply
If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse ourCommenting Guidelines.













